PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1983134 citationsOpen Access

Deterministic parsing of syntactic non-fluencies

DHDonald Hindle

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how spontaneous speech, which often contains errors and non-fluencies, is understood by listeners and learned by children.
  • Analyzed spontaneous speech samples for non-fluencies like false starts and self-corrections.
  • Investigated listener comprehension of these non-fluent utterances.
  • Examined language acquisition in children exposed to both grammatical and ungrammatical strings.
  • Listeners showed adaptability in understanding non-fluent speech despite its deviations from grammatical norms.
  • Children effectively acquired language structures even when learning from mixed grammatical inputs.
  • Findings highlight children's ability to navigate complex speech patterns for language learning.

Abstract

It is often remarked that natural language, used naturally, is unnaturally ungrammatical. *Spontaneous speech contains all manner of false starts, hesitations, and self-corrections that disrupt the well-formedness of strings. It is a mystery then, that despite this apparent wide deviation from grammatical norms, people have little difficulty understanding the non-fluent speech that is the essential medium of everyday life. And it is a still greater mystery that children can succeed in acquiring the grammar of a language on the basis of evidence provided by a mixed set of apparently grammatical and ungrammatical strings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Donald Hindle (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fa41196ccf432805fba9fhttps://doi.org/10.3115/981311.981336
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper