PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2019Einstein (São Paulo)11 citationsOpen Access

Hormone receptor-negative as a predictive factor for pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer

LSLuana Carolina Ferreira Fiuza SilvaInstituto Brasileiro de Controle do CâncerLALilian Silva Martins de ArrudaFaculdade de Medicina do ABCWDWaldec Jorge DavidFaculdade de Medicina do ABC

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define a predictive factor for pathologic complete response, compare the oncologic outcomes associated with the degree of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and to analyze pathologic complete response as a prognostic factor for overall survival and progression-free survival. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients admitted to Hospital Estadual Mário Covas and Hospital Anchieta from 2008 to 2012, with locally advanced breast cancer. Hormone receptor status, HER2 status, histologic and nuclear grade, age upon diagnosis and histological type of the tumor were analyzed. Pathologic evaluation of the tumor was subdivided into pathologic complete response, defined by the absence of tumor; intermediate response, considered as a favorable stage; and poor response, considering low-responder patients. Data obtained were submitted to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The study included 243 patients. There was an association of pathologic complete response with HER-2 negative, histological grade 3, stage III, hormone receptor negative, positive lymph node, older age and more advanced tumors. However, after multivariate analysis the only predictor of pathologic complete response was the presence of negative hormone receptor. By analyzing the prognostic factors, hormone receptor negative was considered as an independent risk factor, and pathologic complete response was considered as an independent protective factor. CONCLUSION: Hormone receptor negative is predictive of pathologic complete response and is an isolated risk factor for lower progression-free survival and overall survival. Pathologic complete response is a protective factor for these same survival analyses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Silva et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fbff096ccf432805fc369https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019ao3434
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Definition and Impact of Pathologic Complete Response on Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Various Intrinsic Breast Cancer Subtypes2012 · 2,702 citations
  2. 2Correlation of various pathologic complete response (pCR) definitions with long-term outcome and the prognostic value of pCR in various breast cancer subtypes: Results from the German neoadjuvant meta-analysis.2011 · 55 citations
  3. 3Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation2017 · 3,291 citations
  4. 4ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance): Cardiac events (CE) among those receiving neoadjuvant anthracyclines (A) and taxanes with trastuzumab (T) for HER2+ breast cancer.2013 · 4 citations
  5. 5Pathologic Complete Response Predicts Recurrence-Free Survival More Effectively by Cancer Subset: Results From the I-SPY 1 TRIAL—CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 66572012 · 443 citations