PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 23, 2012Circulation348 citationsOpen Access

Ideal Cardiovascular Health Predicts Lower Risks of Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, and Vascular Death Across Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics

View Full Paper
CDChuanhui DongTRTatjana RundekCWClinton B. Wright

Structured PICO

Does a higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in a multiethnic cohort?

P
Population
2,981 subjects free of myocardial infarction and stroke at baseline from the Northern Manhattan Study, mean age 69±10 years, 54% Caribbean Hispanic, 25% black, 21% white.
I
Intervention
Higher number of American Heart Association ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics (2, 3, 4, or 5 to 6 metrics)
C
Comparator
0 to 1 ideal CVH metrics
O
Outcome
Cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and vascular deathcomposite

A higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics is associated with a steep, graded reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disease across diverse racial and ethnic groups.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the relationship of cardiovascular health (CVH), defined by the American Heart Association, and specific cardiovascular outcomes is lacking, particularly among Hispanics. This study sought to evaluate the relationship between the number of ideal CVH metrics and cardiovascular risk, overall and by event subtype, in a multiethnic community-based prospective cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2981 subjects (mean age, 69±10 years; 54% Caribbean Hispanic, 25% black, 21% white) free of myocardial infarction and stroke at baseline in the Northern Manhattan Study were prospectively followed up (median follow-up, 11 years). The relationship between the number of ideal CVH metrics and the risk of cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and vascular death, was investigated. Overall, a strong gradient relationship was observed between the adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular disease and the number of ideal CVH metrics: 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.89), 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.76), 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.63), and 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.63) for those having 2, 3, 4, and 5 to 6 ideal CVH metrics, respectively, compared with those having 0 to 1 ideal CVH metrics (P for trend <0.0001). Similar graded relationships were found between the number of ideal CVH metrics and the adjusted incidence rate for each specific outcome and among whites, blacks, and Caribbean Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated a steep gradient relationship between ideal CVH and individual cardiovascular disease end points, including stroke, that was similar for whites, blacks, and Caribbean Hispanics. This evidence supports the application of the AHA ideal cardiovascular health metrics for cardiovascular disease risk assessment and health promotion for all Americans regardless of race-ethnic background.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dong et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fd21f2badbc352afec5efhttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.081083
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Estimating modifiable coronary heart disease risk in multiple regions of the world: the INTERHEART Modifiable Risk Score2010 · 287 citations
  2. 2Adolescent Overweight and Future Adult Coronary Heart Disease2007 · 534 citations
  3. 3Explaining the Decrease in U.S. Deaths from Coronary Disease, 1980–20002007 · 2,781 citations
  4. 4Cardiovascular risk factor trends and options for reducing future coronary heart disease mortality in the United States of America2009 · 199 citations
  5. 5Race-Ethnic Disparities in the Impact of Stroke Risk Factors2001 · 377 citations