PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2021European Journal of Public Health16 citationsOpen Access

Physical inactivity in nine European and Central Asian countries: an analysis of national population-based survey results

SWStephen WhitingRMRomeu MendesKAKarim Abu‐Omar

Structured PICO

What is the prevalence and pattern of physical inactivity among adults in nine European and Central Asian countries?

P
Population
Nationally representative samples of adults in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Republic of Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkey and Uzbekistan
O
Outcome
National prevalence of physical inactivity and proportional contribution to total physical activity during work, transport and leisure-timepatient reported

Physical inactivity prevalence varies widely across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, with leisure-time physical activity contributing minimally to total activity, highlighting a target for public health interventions.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases. However, recent and systematically obtained national-level data to guide policy responses are often lacking, especially in countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. This article describes physical inactivity patterns among adults in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Republic of Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkey and Uzbekistan. METHODS: Data were collected using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire drawing nationally representative samples of adults in each country. The national prevalence of physical inactivity was calculated as well as the proportional contribution to total physical activity (PA) during work, transport and leisure-time. An adjusted logistic regression model was applied to analyze the association of age, gender, education, household status and income with physical inactivity. RESULTS: National prevalence of physical inactivity ranged from 10.1% to 43.6%. The highest proportion of PA was registered during work or in the household in most countries, whereas the lowest was during leisure-time in all countries. Physical inactivity was more likely with older age in eight countries, with female gender in three countries, and with living alone in three countries. There was no clear pattern of association with education and income. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of physical inactivity is heterogeneous across the region. PA during leisure-time contributes minimally to total PA in all countries. Policies and programs that increase opportunities for active travel and leisure-time PA, especially for older adults, women and people living alone will be an essential part of strategies to increase overall population PA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Whiting et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fe2adfa36b6e053fcfe06https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Social support and leisure-time physical activity: longitudinal evidence from the Brazilian Pró-Saúde cohort study2011 · 35 citations
  2. 2Promoting health-enhancing physical activity in Europe: Current state of surveillance, policy development and implementation2018 · 133 citations
  3. 3AN ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO CREATING ACTIVE LIVING COMMUNITIES2005 · 3,359 citations
  4. 4Domains of physical activity and all-cause mortality: systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of cohort studies2011 · 847 citations
  5. 5Prevalence and determinants of smoking in Belarus: A national household survey, 20002001 · 41 citations