PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 13, 2007European Heart Journal193 citationsOpen Access

Effect of age and sex on carotid intima-media thickness, elasticity and brachial endothelial function in healthy adults: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study

View Full Paper
MJMarkus JuonalaMKMika KähönenTLTomi Laitinen

Key Points

  • The study aimed to establish reference values and investigate how age and sex relate to carotid intima-media thickness, compliance, and brachial endothelial function in young adults.
  • Measured carotid intima-media thickness, compliance, and brachial flow-mediated dilatation using ultrasound in 2265 subjects aged 24-39 years.

Structured PICO

P
Population
2,265 young healthy adults aged 24-39 years from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study
O
Outcome
Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), carotid compliance (CAC), and brachial flow-mediated dilatation (FMD)surrogate

Sex differences in markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in young adults are mostly explained by differences in risk factors and vessel size, emphasizing the importance of risk factor control.

Abstract

AIMS: The objective was to produce reference values and to analyse the associations of age and sex with carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), carotid compliance (CAC), and brachial flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) in young healthy adults. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured IMT, CAC, and FMD with ultrasound in 2265 subjects aged 24-39 years. The mean values (mean +/- SD) in men and women were 0.592 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.572 +/- 0.08 mm (P < 0.0001) for IMT, 2.00 +/- 0.66 vs. 2.31 +/- 0.77%/10 mmHg (P < 0.0001) for CAC, and 6.95 +/- 4.00 vs. 8.83 +/- 4.56% (P < 0.0001) for FMD. The sex differences in IMT 95% confidence interval (CI) for sex difference -0.013 to 0.004 mm, P = 0.37 and CAC (-0.01 to 0.18%/10 mmHg, P = 0.09) became non-significant after adjustments with risk factors and carotid diameter. In FMD, the sex difference was unaltered after adjustments for risk factors, but was reversed after adjustment with brachial diameter (95% CI 0.18-1.32%, P < 0.01). With aging, IMT increased 5.7 +/- 0.4 microm/year and CAC decreased 0.042 +/- 0.003%/10 mmHg/year. The association of age with IMT and CAC was slightly attenuated (12 and 22%, respectively) after adjustments with risk factors, but remained significant (both P < 0.0001). Aging was not significantly related to brachial FMD (P = 0.16). CONCLUSION: Reference values produced in the present study can be utilized in the cardiovascular risk stratification among young people. Sex differences in the markers of subclinical atherosclerosis were mostly explained by differences in risk factors and vessel size. This emphasizes the importance of risk factor control in the prevention of atherosclerosis in young adults.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Juonala et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fe8fb01be78fe81602b1bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm556
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper