PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2000American Journal of Industrial Medicine161 citations

Outcomes in work-related upper extremity and low back injuries: Results of a retrospective study

View Full Paper
GPGlenn PranskyKBKaty BenjaminCHCarolyn Hill‐Fotouhi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of treatment for work-related injuries and illnesses are multidimensional and complex, but have rarely been explored in detail. This study was intended to provide information on a sample of workers representing a range of jobs and employers typical of the workers compensation system. METHODS: A mailed, self-report survey measuring multiple dimensions was conducted. Identified through the New Hampshire Division of Workers' Compensation First Report of Injury database, a sample of workers with injuries to their lower back (60%) or upper extremities (40%) a year prior to the study were surveyed. Response rate was 80% (N=169; upper extremity cases=70; low back cases=99). RESULTS: Most (82.8%) were working one year post-injury. Over half reported residual effects of the injury on work or activities of daily living. Many working subjects reported persistent injury-related anxiety and pain at the end of the work day, worse in those with low back pain compared to those with upper extremity injuries. Almost 40% of those who returned to work suffered a reinjury. Forty-four percent of respondents suffered significant injury-related financial problems, which were worse in those who had been out of work for longer periods. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational musculoskeletal injuries do result in significant, long-term adverse physical, economic, and psychological consequences, as demonstrated in self-reported surveys.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pransky et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fe98d92676d5461fd3ebfhttps://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(200004)37:4<400::aid-ajim10>3.0.co;2-c
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper