PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1986Journal of the American Statistical Association44 citations

Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression

View Full Paper
GGGail Gong

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Given a prediction rule based on a set of patients, what is the probability of incorrectly predicting the outcome of a new patient? Call this probability the true error. An optimistic estimate is the apparent error, or the proportion of incorrect predictions on the original set of patients, and it is the goal of this article to study estimates of the excess error, or the difference between the true and apparent errors. I consider three estimates of the excess error: cross-validation, the jackknife, and the bootstrap. Using simulations and real data, the three estimates for a specific prediction rule are compared. When the prediction rule is allowed to be complicated, overfitting becomes a real danger, and excess error estimation becomes important. The prediction rule chosen here is moderately complicated, involving a variable-selection procedure based on forward logistic regression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gail Gong (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fea41d8c5cf602efd588bhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2287975
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper