PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 22, 2026Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics0 citationsOpen Access

When does Orthodontics make a difference? Threshold effects in attractiveness perception and hiring intentions

GGGil Guilherme GASPARELLOOTOtso TirkkonenSMSergio Luiz Mota-Júnior

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess how orthodontic treatment affects perceived smile attractiveness and hiring intentions.
  • Cross-sectional observational study with 288 adult participants in Brazil.
  • Participants rated attractiveness and hiring intentions based on pre- and post-treatment smile photographs.
  • Data analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and logistic mixed-effects regression models.
  • Post-treatment attractiveness ratings significantly increased (mean VAS: 54.2 vs. 36.4; p < 0.001).
  • Hiring likelihood improved after treatment (44.0% vs. 27.9%; p < 0.001).
  • Attractiveness was a significant independent predictor of hiring intention, while treatment interaction with VAS was not significant (p = 0.201).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of orthodontic treatment on perceived smile attractiveness and hiring decisions in a Brazilian adult population. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 288 adult participants recruited via an online survey. Three clinical cases were selected, and standardized pre- and post-treatment smile photographs were shown in randomized order. Participants rated attractiveness on a 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and indicated hiring intention ("yes," "no," or "can't tell"). Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and logistic mixed-effects regression models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Post-treatment images showed significantly higher attractiveness ratings, compared with pre-treatment images (mean VAS: 54.2 vs. 36.4; p < 0.001). Hiring likelihood also increased after orthodontic treatment (44.0% vs. 27.9%; p < 0.001). Affirmative hiring decisions were consistently associated with higher attractiveness scores. In multivariable analysis, attractiveness was a significant independent predictor of hiring intention, while the interaction between VAS and treatment status was not significant (p = 0.201). Individual-level assessments demonstrated that many participants initially classified as non-hireable were reevaluated positively after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic treatment significantly improved smile attractiveness and increased hiring likelihood. Dental alignment alone was sufficient to shift social judgments, although overall facial esthetics also contributed. The identified attractiveness threshold marked the point at which orthodontic improvement began to influence employability perceptions. These findings highlight the psychosocial relevance of orthodontics beyond functional benefits.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

GASPARELLO et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff2a8d674f7c03778b25dhttps://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.31.2.e2625314.oar
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper