PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 22, 2026Frontiers in Pharmacology0 citationsOpen Access

The efficacy and safety of darolutamide combination therapy in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

XCXi CaoDLDi LiZHZhuoyi Han

Key Points

  • This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of darolutamide combination therapy in advanced prostate cancer patients, focusing on overall and metastasis-free survival.
  • Conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials from databases like PubMed and EMBASE.
  • Evaluated overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and adverse events in patients with mHSPC and nmCRPC.
  • Utilized risk-of-bias assessment tools and publication bias evaluation through funnel plots.
  • Darolutamide combination therapy significantly prolonged overall survival and metastasis-free survival in nmCRPC patients compared to placebo.
  • Overall survival was favorable in mHSPC patients receiving darolutamide with or without docetaxel.
  • No serious adverse events, such as heart failure, bone fracture, and hypertension, were reported with darolutamide treatment.

Abstract

Background Darolutamide is the next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, including non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the efficacy and safety of darolutamide are nonetheless worthy of further clinical studies. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the overall survival, metastasis-free survival and various specific adverse events of darolutamide combination therapy in patients with mHSPC or nmCRPC. Methods This meta-analysis was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov , and the Cochrane Library for English-language articles to collect randomized clinical trials of darolutamide combination therapy in mHSPC and nmCRPC from the start of the database to 15 January 2026. The primary efficacy outcomes were overall survival and metastasis-free survival. Key safety outcomes included the total number of overall adverse events, the total number of grade ≥3 adverse events and serious adverse events, and the occurrence of specific adverse events of interest. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. Results There were 8 research articles from 3 randomized clinical trials with 3,483 patients involved in this meta-analysis, including 1,509 nmCRPC patients from the ARAMIS trial, 1974 mHSPC patients from the ARASENS and ARANOTE trials. Combining darolutamide with ADT significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in nmCRPC patients compared with placebo plus ADT. And darolutamide plus ADT with or without docetaxel also showed favorable overall survival in mHSPC patients. Subgroup meta-analyses of OS among mHSPC patients for baseline total PSA (tPSA) values and Gleason scores showed the beneficial efficacy of darolutamide in mHSPC. The addition of darolutamide in ADT and/or docetaxel did not lead to serious adverse events, like heart failure, bone fracture and hypertension, in both nmCRPC and mHSPC patients. Conclusion Darolutamide combination therapy was beneficial to the prognosis and demonstrated a favorable safety profile in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Systematic Review Registration Identifier CRD420251145736.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff2a8d674f7c03778b26fhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1818807
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper