Background/Aims: Combining therapies targeting distinct pathways shows promise in breaking the therapeutic ceiling for inflammatory bowel disease. The study explored real-world experiences and gaps between current evidence and clinical practice regarding advanced combined therapies. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted via QR code during meetings or email invitation. The survey covered participant demographics, experiences with advanced combined therapies for ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and knowledge of these therapies. Results: Between March and October of 2024, 234 participants from 20 countries replied and 51.7% had adopted advanced combined therapies (86.0% had treated ulcerative colitis, 66.9% Crohn's disease, and 52.9% both). Among the 48.3% who had no experience, 76.1% would try if indicated. Refractory diseases were the most common indications. For combined therapies duration, 52.8% were time-oriented, favoring limited use within 6 months. Physicians reported no adverse events in 59.5% of cases. Of the events, infections (69.8%) were most common. Add-on strategy was the most commonly adopted, particularly the Janus kinase inhibitor added on anti-integrin for ulcerative colitis and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha added on anti-interleukin 12/23 for Crohn's disease. Concomitant strategy followed, while sequential strategy was the least used. More non-Asian experts were experienced (82.4%) compared to Asian participants (46.5%). Both inexperienced and non-Asian physicians preferred add-on strategy, but prioritized goal-oriented use, targeting clinical and endoscopic remission. Conclusions: In real-world practice, advanced combined therapies were primarily used for refractory inflammatory bowel disease with limited duration. Add-on use was the most adopted. Differences in treatment approaches reflect varying levels of physician experience and geographical locations.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.