PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 22, 2026International Journal of Versatile Research and Analysis0 citationsOpen Access

Multimodal Digital Technologies in Mental Health Care: AI, Virtual Reality, Wearables and Digital Therapeutics A Comparative Review

SSShruti SrivastavaASAyushi SinghSSShimpi Singh

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal digital technologies in addressing mental health care gaps, especially in resource-limited settings.
  • Reviewed twenty-four reliable sources on digital tools for mental health care.
  • Evaluated tools based on six factors: effectiveness, ease of use, affordability, authority approval, user retention, and access.
  • Analyzed MindGuard AI's performance with a focus on its accuracy in risk identification.
  • MindGuard AI achieved 91% accuracy in risk identification, outperforming single-signal methods by 10%.
  • Significant structural obstacles to digital tool implementation were identified across all categories studied.
  • Recommendations were made for enhancing decision-making processes in mental health care.

Abstract

One in ten people worldwide lives with a recognized mental health condition, yet in poorer countries, only about two out of every seven individuals receive help from trained professionals. In places where clinics are scarce, machines operate quietly, filling in the gaps. Scientists are increasingly turning to screens, sensors, and software to address these challenges. After years of testing, four types of tools stand out: systems that recognize patterns, devices that create virtual environments, wearable trackers that detect subtle physical signs, and apps that are approved like medications. Based on reports from twenty-four reliable sources, each tool is evaluated by six key factors: effectiveness, ease of widespread use, affordability, approval by authorities, user retention, and equal access for all. Careful analysis shows varying levels of impact, with some tools making a bigger difference than others. Across all categories studied, five major structural obstacles consistently emerge. A different approach seems more promising—one that involves doctors at the core of decision-making, not just as an afterthought. Real-world implementation is crucial, especially in places like India, where language and financial barriers influence how these tools are adopted. Throughout this process, a specific tool helps clarify things: MindGuard AI, developed by us, combines structured responses, chat understanding using BERT, and facial analysis using MobileNetV2. It identifies risks early by analyzing multiple signals. In 240 tests, it achieved 91% accuracy—ten percentage points better than using just one signal alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Srivastava et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff33bd674f7c03778bc3bhttps://doi.org/10.56975/ijvra.v4i5.706723
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Artificial intelligence for mental health: A narrative review of applications, challenges, and future directions in digital health2025
  2. 2Data-driven approaches to tackling mental health2024
  3. 3Data-driven approaches to tackling mental health2024
  4. 4AI-assisted Diagnosing, Monitoring, and Treatment of Mental Disorders: A Survey2024 · 14 citations
  5. 5Early Detection of Mental Health Disorders Using AI: A Comprehensive Review2025