PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1995Diabetes Care134 citations

A Practical Model of Diabetes Management and Education

View Full Paper
RGRussell E. Glasgow

Key Points

  • To explore a conceptual model of diabetes self-management and education across three levels of care.
  • Describes three primary levels: social environment, interactions with health care providers, and long-term health outcomes.
  • Emphasizes cost-effective activities for all patients and intensive management for higher-risk groups.
  • Identifies gaps in research around social and contextual factors affecting diabetes care.
  • Highlights the cyclical nature of patient-provider interactions leading to better self-management and outcomes.
  • Suggests a systems approach to reduce negative stigmas and improve adherence to diabetes guidelines.

Abstract

This article discusses an evolving conceptual model of diabetes self-management and patient education. The model contains three primary levels or stages: 1) social environment and contextual factors, which have received little research attention; 2) patient-health care provider interactions, self-management behaviors, and short-term physiological outcomes, which constitute an ongoing cycle of care feedback system; and 3) longer term health and quality-of-life outcomes, which include the major societal costs of treating diabetes complications. The assessment and intervention implications of factors within each of these levels are discussed, with emphasis on both low-cost system-wide activities appropriate for all patients and higher cost activities and resources (e.g., intensive management à la the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial) for appropriately targeted or higher risk patients. I hope that such a systems approach to diabetes management can help reduce victim blaming (whether the victim is the noncompliant patient or the insensitive provider). Such conceptual models, if practically oriented, may help accelerate the development, evaluation, and dissemination of programs that facilitate both patient and health care team adherence to recommended guidelines for diabetes care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Russell E. Glasgow (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff3c0d13714ec96fee324https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.18.1.117
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Redesigning Diabetes Care for Treatment Inertia: A Population Health Model2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Development of Family Empowerment Model in Diabetes Management Among Type 2 DM Patients2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Self-Management Mentoring Model in Improving the Health Quality of Life of Productive Age Diabetics2024
  4. 4Self-care management education for diabetes mellitus patients based on disease perception and length of suffering2025 · 2 citations
  5. 5An Integrative Model of Self-Regulation in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review of Individual and Family-Based Interventions2025 · 5 citations