PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1975Circulation244 citationsOpen Access

Compensatory changes of the distal coronary vascular bed during progressive coronary constriction.

View Full Paper
KGK. Lance GouldKLKirk LipscombCCClay A. Calvert

Key Points

  • To determine the hemodynamic resistance and compensatory capacity of the distal coronary vascular bed during progressive proximal coronary stenosis.
  • Evaluated hemodynamic characteristics across 157 experimental coronary stenoses in nine open-chest dogs.

Structured PICO

Does progressive proximal coronary stenosis alter coronary vascular bed resistance and pressure gradient-flow relationships in opened-chest dogs?

P
Population
9 opened-chest dogs with 157 different experimental coronary stenoses
I
Intervention
Progressive proximal coronary stenosis with flow varied from resting to maximal values by intracoronary injection of Hypaque-M, 75%
O
Outcome
Coronary vascular bed resistance and pressure gradient-flow relationshipssurrogate

This foundational preclinical study demonstrates that compensatory distal coronary vasodilation maintains resting flow up to 85% stenosis, beyond which autoregulation fails.

Abstract

The degree and effectiveness of compensatory changes in the distal coronary vascular bed during progressive proximal coronary stenosis have not been described. In this study, coronary vascular bed resistance and pressure gradient-flow relationships were determined for 157 different stenoses in nine opened-chest dogs by measuring coronary flow, aortic pressure, and coronary pressure distal to a coronary constrictor while flow was varied from resting to maximal values by the intracoronary injection of Hypaque-M, 75% (previously shown to cause transient, maximal vasodilatation comparable to ten second occlusion). This approach provided a means of hemodynamically characterizing coronary stenoses in a standary, experimental manner for quantitative analysis of different arteries at different flow rates as found in the intact coronary circulation. The results show that 1) pressure gradient-flow characteristics or hydraulic resistance of stenoses do not become abnormal enough to alter normal resting coronary flow nor to elicit compensatory changes for stenoses up to constriction of approximately 60% of the diameter, 2) compensatory vasodilatation of the distal coronary vascular bed maintains near normal resting flow for lesions between 60% and 85% diameter stenosis but adaptive vasodilatation fails to compensate for the high resistance of lesions greater than 85% diameter stenosis, and 3) there is vasodilator reserve still present when total coronary artery flow is reduced below normal by a stenosis. This vasodilator reserve probably exists in the epicardium since the endocardium is characteristically underperfused due to the low coronary pressure caused by stenosis and is therefore likely to be maximally vasodilated with no remaining vasodilator reserve.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gould et al. (1975) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff5a64fb650da4ffebd53https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.51.6.1085
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nitroglycerin and Heterogeneity of Myocardial Blood Flow REDUCED SUBENDOCARDIAL BLOOD FLOW AND VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE FORCE1973 · 86 citations
  2. 2Factors Affecting Flow Through a Stenosed Vessel1964 · 59 citations
  3. 3THE EFFECT OF EXTERNAL CONSTRICTION OF A BLOOD VESSEL ON BLOOD FLOW1944 · 103 citations
  4. 4Experience With a New Electro-Magnetic Flow-Meter for use in Blood-Flow Determinations in Surgery1960 · 78 citations
  5. 5Myocardial steal produced by coronary vasodilation in chronic coronary artery occlusion1973 · 140 citations