PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2004International Journal of Sports Medicine78 citations

Validation of the MetaMax II Portable Metabolic Measurement System

View Full Paper
PLPeter LarssonKWKarin WadellEJErland Jakobsson

Structured PICO

Does the MetaMax II portable metabolic measurement system provide valid oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide excretion measurements compared to the Douglas Bag technique in exercising males?

P
Population
19 male subjects (9 recreationally active, 10 well-trained) undergoing exercise testing on an electronically braked bicycle
I
Intervention
MetaMax II portable metabolic measurement system
C
Comparator
Douglas Bag technique
O
Outcome
Oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide excretion at various workloads (100 W, 200 W, 250 W, and maximal exercise at 325 W)surrogate

The MetaMax II portable metabolic measurement system is a valid tool for measuring oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide excretion during exercise at workloads between 100 W and 250 W.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of the MetaMax II portable metabolic measurement system against the Douglas Bag technique. Nine recreationally active male subjects were included in a validation at 100 W, 10 well-trained male subjects at 200 W and 10 well-trained males at 250 W and at maximal exercise (volitional fatigue at a mean workload of 325 W). All testing was performed on an electronically braked bicycle at 60 rpm. At 100 W, the influence on MetaMax II measurements of adding a Douglas Bag breathing valve in series to the MetaMax II was investigated. The oxygen uptake was, for the MetaMax II, at 100 W mean 0.03 l x min (-1) higher (p < 0.01), at 200 W mean 0.02 l x min (-1) (n. s.) lower, at 250 W mean 0.04 l x min (-1) (n. s.) higher, and at 325 W mean 0.11 l x min (-1) (p < 0.05) higher. The carbon dioxide excretion was, for the MetaMax II, at 100 W mean 0.06 l x min (-1) (p < 0.01) lower, at 200 W mean 0.11 l x min (-1) (p < 0.05) lower, at 250 W mean 0.03 l x min (-1) (n. s.) lower, and at 325 W mean 0.16 l x min (-1) (p < 0.05) lower. The addition of a breathing valve in series to the MetaMax II resulted in lower breathing frequency, a higher ventilated tidal volume, and an affected gas measurement validation. In conclusion, the MetaMax II was found to be valid for metabolic gas measurements between 100 and at least 250 W.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Larsson et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fff69d13714ec96fef7e2https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-819953
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper