PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 21, 2010Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry333 citations

Evaluation of a classroom‐based psychosocial intervention in conflict‐affected Nepal: a cluster randomized controlled trial

View Full Paper
MJMark J. D. JordansIKIvan H. KomproeWTWietse A. Tol

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In situations of ongoing violence, childhood psychosocial and mental health problems require care. However, resources and evidence for adequate interventions are scarce for children in low- and middle-income countries. This study evaluated a school-based psychosocial intervention in conflict-affected, rural Nepal. METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate changes on a range of indicators, including psychiatric symptoms (depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder), psychological difficulties, resilience indicators (hope, prosocial behavior) and function impairment. Children (n = 325) (mean age = 12.7, SD = 1.04, range 11-14 years) with elevated psychosocial distress were allocated to a treatment or waitlist group. RESULTS: Comparisons of crude change scores showed significant between-group differences on several outcome indicators, with moderate effect sizes (Cohen d = .41 to .58). After correcting for nested variance within schools, no evidence for treatment effects was found on any outcome variable. Additional analyses showed gender effects for treatment on prosocial behavior (mean change difference: 2.70; 95% CI, .97 to 4.44), psychological difficulties (-2.19; 95% CI, -3.82 to -.56), and aggression (-4.42; 95% CI, -6.16 to -2.67). An age effect for treatment was found for hope (.90; 95% CI, -1.54 to -.26). CONCLUSIONS: A school-based psychosocial intervention demonstrated moderate short-term beneficial effects for improving social-behavioral and resilience indicators among subgroups of children exposed to armed conflict. The intervention reduced psychological difficulties and aggression among boys, increased prosocial behavior among girls, and increased hope for older children. The intervention did not result in reduction of psychiatric symptoms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jordans et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1008732badbc352aff301ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02209.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1School-Based Mental Health Intervention for Children Affected by Political Violence in Indonesia2008 · 285 citations
  2. 2Screening for psychosocial distress amongst war‐affected children: cross‐cultural construct validity of the CPDS2009 · 48 citations
  3. 3The Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings2010 · 544 citations
  4. 4Healing in familiar settings: Support for children and youth in the classroom and community2003 · 51 citations
  5. 5An alternative approach to cross-cultural function assessment2002 · 234 citations