PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 9, 2006The Journal of Environment & Development246 citations

Corruption, Democracy, and Environmental Policy

View Full Paper
LPLorenzo PellegriniRGReyer Gerlagh

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical studies have shown that democracy and corruption influence environmental policies. In this article, the authors empirically analyze the relative importance of these determinants of environmental policy. When these variables are jointly included as explanatory variables in a multiple regression analysis, the authors found that corruption stands out as a substantial and significant determinant of environmental policies, while proxies for democracy have an insignificant impact. Nevertheless, democracy could affect environmental policy stringency given that countries with a history of democratic rule tend to be less corrupted. The authors argue that improving environmental quality following increasing income is less probable in developing countries with institutional disarray. Finally, and more optimistically, when considering the results in the context of institutions and growth, the authors conclude that there is scope for reaping a double dividend, when institutional improvements and reductions in corruption induce higher economic growth rates and stricter environmental policies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pellegrini et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a100d9bfa36b6e053fd2d74https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496506290960
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper