PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2005Australasian Journal of Paramedicine147 citationsOpen Access

Influence of High-Intensity Interval Training on Adaptations in Well-Trained Cyclists

View Full Paper
PLPaul B. LaursenCSCecilia M. ShingJPJonathan M. Peake

Structured PICO

Does high-intensity interval training improve ventilatory thresholds, anaerobic capacity, plasma volume, and performance in well-trained endurance cyclists?

P
Population
38 well-trained endurance cyclists
I
Intervention
3 different high-intensity interval training regimens for 4 weeks (group 1: n = 8, 8 x 60% T(max) at P(max), 1:2 work-recovery ratio; group 2: n = 9, 8 x 60% T(max) at P(max), recovery at 65% maximum heart rate; group 3: n = 10, 12 x 30 seconds at 175% PPO, 4.5-minute recovery)
C
Comparator
Control group (n = 11)
O
Outcome
Changes in first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2), anaerobic capacity (ANC), plasma volume (PV), Vo2peak, and 40-km time-trial (TT40) performance after 2 and 4 weeks of trainingsurrogate

High-intensity interval training improves performance and physiological markers (Vo2peak, VT1, VT2, ANC) in well-trained cyclists through peripheral rather than central adaptations.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of 3 different high-intensity interval training regimens on the first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT(1) and VT(2)), anaerobic capacity (ANC), and plasma volume (PV) in well-trained endurance cyclists. Before and after 2 and 4 weeks of training, 38 well-trained cyclists (Vo(2)peak = 64.5 +/- 5.2 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)) performed (a) a progressive cycle test to measure Vo(2)peak, peak power output (PPO), VT(1), and VT(2); (b) a time to exhaustion test (T(max)) at their Vo(2)peak power output (P(max)); and (c) a 40-km time-trial (TT(40)). Subjects were assigned to 1 of 4 training groups (group 1: n = 8, 8 x 60% T(max) at P(max), 1:2 work-recovery ratio; group 2: n = 9, 8 x 60% T(max) at P(max), recovery at 65% maximum heart rate; group 3: n = 10, 12 x 30 seconds at 175% PPO, 4.5-minute recovery; control group: n = 11). The TT(40) performance, Vo(2)peak, VT(1), VT(2), and ANC were all significantly increased in groups 1, 2, and 3 (p < 0.05) but not in the control group. However, PV did not change in response to the 4-week training program. Changes in TT(40) performance were modestly related to the changes in Vo(2)peak, VT(1), VT(2), and ANC (r = 0.41, 0.34, 0.42, and 0.40, respectively; all p < 0.05). In conclusion, the improvements in TT(40) performance were related to significant increases in Vo(2)peak, VT(1), VT(2), and ANC but were not accompanied by significant changes in PV. Thus, peripheral adaptations rather than central adaptations are likely responsible for the improved performances witnessed in well-trained endurance athletes following various forms of high-intensity interval training programs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Laursen et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10327bd8c5cf602efdd608https://doi.org/10.1519/15964.1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Heart rate and performance parameters in elite cyclists: a longitudinal study.2000 · 304 citations
  2. 2Influence of Test Duration and Event Specificity on Maximal Accumulated Oxygen Deficit of High Performance Track Cyclists1995 · 40 citations
  3. 3Is the Maximal Accumulated Oxygen Deficit an Adequate Measure of the Anaerobic Capacity?1996 · 38 citations
  4. 4Physiological effects of tapering in highly trained athletes1992 · 167 citations
  5. 5Increased training intensity effects on plasma lactate, ventilatory threshold, and endurance1989 · 137 citations