PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2007Academy of Management Learning and Education127 citations

A Meta-Analysis of the Predictive Validity of the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) and Undergraduate Grade Point Average (UGPA) for Graduate Student Academic Performance.

View Full Paper
NKNathan R. KuncelMCMarcus CredéLTLisa L. Thomas

Structured PICO

Do the GMAT and UGPA predict graduate student academic performance in business school students?

P
Population
64,583 graduate business school students across 402 independent samples
I
Intervention
Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) and Undergraduate Grade Point Average (UGPA)
O
Outcome
Graduate student academic performance

The combination of GMAT and UGPA provides high predictive validity for graduate business school performance, with GMAT being the superior individual predictor.

Abstract

Considerable debate both within and outside of academic circles surrounds the validity of standardized tests for predicting student performance in graduate business schools. This meta-analysis aggregates the existing literature on the validity of the two most heavily used predictors in business school admissions: the GMAT and undergraduate grade point average. Results based on over 402 independent samples across 64,583 students indicate that the GMAT is a superior predictor to UGPA and that the two combined yield a high level of validity for predicting student performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kuncel et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10345e4fb650da4fff1772https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.24401702
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper