PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1981Psychophysiology208 citations

Information Processing and Cardiovascular Control

View Full Paper
GMG. MulderLML.J.M. Mulder

Key Result

Increased cognitive demands during sentence comprehension and working memory tasks significantly attenuated the power of 0.10 Hz vasomotor oscillations, suggesting decreased baroreflex sensitivity.

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how increased mental task load affects heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity.
  • Computed power spectrum of heart rate variability from cardiac intervals
  • Conducted cognitive tasks with varying demands (sentence comprehension, working memory)
  • Assessed spectral power in specific frequency ranges to evaluate cardiovascular control dynamics
  • Decreased power in the 0.10 Hz region during cognitive loading (p<0.01)
  • Found evidence for reduced baroreflex sensitivity under mental load conditions
  • Showed that this frequency component is mostly uninfluenced by respiratory changes

Structured PICO

Does mental task load affect heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity?

P
Population
Subjects undergoing cognitive tasks (specific demographics and sample size not stated in abstract)
I
Intervention
Mental loading via cognitive tasks (sentence comprehension and working memory tasks)
C
Comparator
Varying levels of cognitive demands with constant signal rate
O
Outcome
Heart rate variability (HRV) spectral power, specifically 0.10 Hz vasomotor oscillationssurrogate

Mental task load significantly attenuates the 0.10 Hz spectral power of heart rate variability, indicating decreased baroreflex sensitivity during cognitive exertion.

Abstract

ABSTRACT It has previously been reported that an increase in mental task load is accompanied by a decrease in heart rate variability (HRV). In most of the experiments relating mental task load to HRV, the number of signals in paced choice reaction time tasks served as the main loading factor. However, this determinant of task load confounds muscular and mental load. In the present article we scored HRV by computing the power spectrum of the cardiac interval signal. The spectrum contains power related to respiratory activity (usually between 0.20 and 0.40 Hz) and power related to non‐linear processes involved in the control of body temperature and blood pressure (between 0.02 and 0.20 Hz). During performance on cognitive tasks the total power is attenuated, but the spectral power between 0.02 and 0.20 Hz (comprising about 80% of the total spectral energy, i.e. HRV) is particularly affected. Within this latter region we especially investigated the power between 0.06 and 0.14 Hz. The power in this region is believed to originate from processes involved in the dynamic control of mean arterial pressure. In Experiment 1 it was shown that this blood pressure‐related spectral component was rather insensitive to considerable changes in respiratory rate and depth. In Experiments 2 and 3 we kept signal rate constant but varied the cognitive demands of a sentence comprehension task and a working memory task. These experiments indicated that the power of the 0.10 Hz vasomotor oscillations was significantly affected by the processing demands of these tasks. The evidence suggested a decreased baroreflex sensitivity (i.e. a decrease in gain) during mental loading. A method was proposed to non‐invasively determine baroreflex sensitivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mulder et al. (1981) studied Mental task load and cardiovascular control. Cognitive tasks (sentence comprehension and working memory) vs. Varying cognitive demands was evaluated on Power of the 0.10 Hz vasomotor oscillations (heart rate variability). Increased cognitive demands during sentence comprehension and working memory tasks significantly attenuated the power of 0.10 Hz vasomotor oscillations, suggesting decreased baroreflex sensitivity.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1036c72badbc352aff8b76https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb02470.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper