PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2006Cambridge Review of International Affairs34 citations

Internet Governance in a Multipolar World: Challenging American Hegemony

View Full Paper
DDDavid Drissel

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article traces the evolution of Internet governance, beginning with the earliest trans-Atlantic Internet ‘community’ associations that formed in the 1970s, up to and including the present mosaic of semi-private ‘self-regulating’ agencies headquartered mostly in the US. The effectiveness of the current system of Internet governance, based in large measure on US-sponsored bodies such as the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), is assessed and contrasted with an emerging international paradigm that seeks greater cross-border harmonisation and multilateral oversight of cyberspace resources. Political disputes arising amongst governments and other interested stakeholders concerning allegations of American regulatory unilateralism are examined. Fuelled in part by a digital divide between the technological haves and have-nots, the battle for the heart and soul of the Internet has reached fever pitch, without any definitive prospects for achieving a global consensus. Special emphasis is placed on emerging US–EU policy differences, as well as divergent North–South positions within the UN-sponsored Working Group on Internet Governance and related conferences. Strategies for enhanced international coordination of Internet governance, building on existing organisational structures and processes, are proposed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David Drissel (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10391a5725bbd5cc60af86https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570500501812
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper