PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2021JMIR Serious Games90 citationsOpen Access

A Gamification Framework for Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: Qualitative Study

AKAli KhaleghiZAZahra AghaeiMMMohammad Amin Mahdavi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive tasks designed to measure or train cognition are often repetitive and presented in a monotonous manner, features that lead to participant boredom and disengagement. In this situation, participants do not put forth their best effort to do these tasks well. As a result, neuropsychologists cannot draw accurate conclusions about the data collected, and intervention effects are reduced. It is assumed that greater engagement and motivation will manifest as improved data quality. Gamification, the use of game elements in nongame settings, has been heralded as a potential mechanism for increasing participant engagement in cognitive tasks. Some studies have reported a positive effect of gamification on participant performance, although most studies have shown mixed results. One reason for these contrasting findings is that most studies have applied poor and heterogeneous design techniques to gamify cognitive tasks. Therefore, an appropriate gamification design framework is needed in these tasks. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to propose a framework to guide the design of gamification in cognitive tasks. METHODS: We employed a design science research (DSR) approach to provide a framework for gamifying cognitive assessments and training by synthesizing current gamification design frameworks and gamification works in cognitive assessment and training, as well as incorporating field experiences. The prototypes of the framework were iteratively evaluated with 17 relevant experts. RESULTS: We proposed a framework consisting of 7 phases: (1) preparation; (2) knowing users; (3) exploring existing tools for assessing or training a targeted cognitive context and determining the suitability of game-up and mapping techniques; (4) ideation; (5) prototyping using the Objects, Mechanics, Dynamics, Emotions (OMDE) design guideline; (6) development; and (7) disseminating and monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: We found that (1) an intermediate design framework is needed to gamify cognitive tasks, which means that game elements should be selected by considering current cognitive assessment or training context characteristics since game elements may impose an irrelevant cognitive load that, in turn, can jeopardize data quality; (2) in addition to developing a new gamified cognitive task from scratch, 2 gamification techniques are widely used (first, adding game elements to an existing cognitive task and second, mapping an existing game to a cognitive function or impairment to assess or train it); and (3) further research is required to investigate the interplay of cognitive processes and game mechanics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khaleghi et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a105d0a5725bbd5cc60e6cdhttps://doi.org/10.2196/21900
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1What gamification design do users want in a self-management application for chronic diseases? - The case of Cystic Fibrosis2017 · 3 citations
  2. 2An Introduction to Design Science2014 · 438 citations
  3. 3IDEAS (Integrate, Design, Assess, and Share): A Framework and Toolkit of Strategies for the Development of More Effective Digital Interventions to Change Health Behavior2016 · 438 citations
  4. 4Gamification in Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment2019 · 11 citations
  5. 5Gamification: a systematic review of design frameworks2017 · 333 citations