PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2011Journal of Neuropsychology177 citationsOpen Access

Prefrontal cortex dysfunction and ‘Jumping to Conclusions’: Bias or deficit?

View Full Paper
LLLaura LuntJBJessica BramhamRMRobin G. Morris

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The ‘beads task’ is used to measure the cognitive basis of delusions, namely the ‘Jumping to Conclusions’ (JTC) reasoning bias. However, it is not clear whether the task merely taps executive dysfunction – known to be impaired in patients with schizophrenia – such as planning and resistance to impulse. To study this, 19 individuals with neurosurgical excisions to the prefrontal cortex, 21 unmedicated adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and 25 healthy controls completed two conditions of the beads task, in addition to tests of memory and executive function as well as control tests of probabilistic reasoning ability. The results indicated that the prefrontal lobe group (in particular, those with left‐sided lesions) demonstrated a JTC bias relative to the ADHD and control groups. Further exploratory analyses indicated that JTC on the beads task was associated with poorer performance in certain executive domains. The results are discussed in terms of the executive demands of the beads task and possible implications for the model of psychotic delusions based on the JTC bias.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lunt et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10722328c2d29469fe7b6fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-6653.2011.02005.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Probabilistic reasoning in schizophrenia: A comparison of the performance of deluded and nondeluded schizophrenic patients and exploration of possible cognitive underpinnings2006 · 92 citations
  2. 2Specific impairments of rule induction in different frontal lobe subgroups2004 · 103 citations
  3. 3Fractionation and Localization of Distinct Frontal Lobe Processes: Evidence from Focal Lesions in Humans2002 · 200 citations
  4. 4A ‘sheep‐goat effect’ in repetition avoidance: Extra‐sensory perception as an effect of subjective probability?1990 · 80 citations
  5. 5The effect of goal-subgoal conflict on planning ability after frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions in humans1997 · 121 citations