PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2001Nuclear Fusion1,361 citationsOpen Access

Plasma-material interactions in current tokamaks and their implications for next step fusion reactors

View Full Paper
GFG. FedericiCSC.H. SkinnerJBJ.N. Brooks

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The major increase in discharge duration and plasma energy in a next-step DT fusion reactor will give rise to important plasma-material effects that will critically influence its operation, safety and performance. Erosion will increase to a scale of several cm from being barely measurable at a micron scale in today's tokamaks. Tritium co-deposited with carbon will strongly affect the operation of machines with carbon plasma-facing components. Controlling plasma wall interactions is critical to achieving high performance in present-day tokamaks and this is likely to continue to be the case in the approach to practical fusion reactors. Recognition of the important consequences of these phenomena has stimulated an internationally co-ordinated effort in the field of plasma-surface interactions supporting the engineering design activities of the international thermonuclear experimental reactor project (ITER) and significant progress has been made in better understanding these issues. This paper reviews the underlying physical processes and the existing experimental database of plasma-material interactions both in tokamaks and laboratory simulation facilities for conditions of direct relevance to next-step fusion reactors. Two main topical groups of interactions are considered: (i) erosion/re-deposition from plasma sputtering and disruptions, including dust and flake generation, (ii) tritium retention and removal. The use of modelling tools to interpret the experimental results and make projections for conditions expected in future devices is explained. Outstanding technical issues and specific recommendations on potential R and D avenues for their resolution are presented. (orig.)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Federici et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10a42ce1a472cb5efd4715https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/41/12/218
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Solution and Diffusion of Hydrogen in Tungsten1969 · 557 citations
  2. 22D modelling of the ASDEX-Upgrade scrape-off layer and divertor plasma1995 · 34 citations
  3. 3The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices2000 · 1,395 citations
  4. 4Cleaning and conditioning of the walls of plasma devices by glow discharges in hydrogen1984 · 49 citations
  5. 5Figure of merit to quantify the sensitivity of materials to runaway electrons in a fusion reactor1993 · 6 citations