PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1983Journal of Gerontology345 citations

Reliability and Validity of Five Mental Health Scales in Older Persons

View Full Paper
SHSamuel HimmelfarbSMStanley A. Murrell

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of five mental health scales in older individuals.
  • Administered five mental health scales to a community sample of 279 older persons and a clinical sample of 109 older persons in psychiatric units.
  • Analyzed internal consistency reliabilities and validity through multivariate analyses of variance.
  • The internal consistency reliabilities for anxiety, depression, and well-being scales were moderately high to high, while life satisfaction was acceptable.
  • The affect balance scale reliability suggests caution in its use.
  • Well-being and depression scales were the strongest discriminators between community and clinical samples.

Abstract

Five scales were assessed as mental health measures for older persons: Affect Balance, The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, General Well-Being, LSI-Z Life Satisfaction, and Trait-Anxiety Inventory. These scales were administered to a community sample of 279 older persons and a clinical sample of 109 older persons who were in psychiatric inpatient units. In both samples, the internal consistency reliabilities for the anxiety, depression, and well-being scales were moderately high to high, for the life satisfaction scale they were acceptable, but the reliabilities for the affect balance scale suggest some caution in its use. For validity, multivariate analyses of variance found that all scales significantly discriminated between the two samples. The well-being and then depression scales were the strongest discriminators while the life satisfaction scale had the weakest validity. Cutting points for the well-being and depression scales are suggested for estimating the proportions of older persons who would be probable at-risk for disorder that requires intervention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Himmelfarb et al. (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10a94f4fb650da4fffcf9dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/38.3.333
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of six depression rating scales in geriatric stroke patients.1989 · 267 citations
  2. 2A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for the medically hospitalized elderly2011 · 95 citations
  3. 3Use of self-administered instruments to assess psychiatric disorders in older people: validity of the General Health Questionnaire, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the self-completion version of the revised Clinical Interview Schedule2013 · 94 citations
  4. 4Construct Validation of an Aging Anxiety Scale for the Elderly2024
  5. 5NEW VERSION OF BRIEF DEPRESSION SCALE1995 · 12 citations