PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1983The Annals of Statistics118 citationsOpen Access

Asymptotic Distribution Theory for Cox-Type Regression Models with General Relative Risk Form

RPRoss L. PrenticeSSSteven G. Self

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop asymptotic distribution theory for Cox-type regression models using non-exponential forms.
  • Utilized the counting process formulation from Andersen and Gill.
  • Relaxed the assumption of an exponential hazard function to allow for general non-negative forms.
  • Explored stability and regularity conditions for the observed information matrix.
  • Showed that under certain regularity conditions, the observed information matrix is consistent.
  • Highlighted the condition that the observed information matrix may not always be positive semidefinite.

Abstract

The theory and application of the Cox (1972) failure time regression model has, almost without exception, assumed an exponential form for the dependence of the hazard function on regression variables. Other regression forms may be more natural or descriptive in some applications. For example, a linear relative risk regression model provides a convenient framework for studying epidemiologic risk factor interactions. This note uses the counting process formulation of Andersen and Gill (1982) to develop asymptotic distribution theory for a class of intensity function regression models in which the usual exponential regression form is relaxed to an arbitrary non-negative twice differentiable form. Some stability and regularity conditions, beyond those of Andersen and Gill, are required to show the consistency of the observed information matrix, which in general need not be positive semidefinite.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prentice et al. (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10c548f85e2d3f759f5d57https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176346247
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper