PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 16, 2024Production and Operations Management60 citationsOpen Access

Balancing Resilience and Efficiency: A Literature Review on Overcoming Supply Chain Disruptions

View Full Paper
FLFlorian LückerATAnna Timonina‐FarkasRSRalf W. Seifert

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The supply chain risk management literature differentiates between disruption risk that arises from supply disruptions to normal activities and recurrent risk that arises from problems in coordinating supply and demand in the absence of disruptions. Over the past decades, significant research has been carried out to better understand supply chain resilience, that is, the ability of a supply chain to mitigate disruptions. Supply chain efficiency, that is, the ability to mitigate recurrent risks in the absence of disruptions has been studied even longer. But only recently have the topics of efficiency and resilience been coupled in the supply chain literature. In this literature review, we focus on the intersection of supply chain resilience and supply chain efficiency. We provide a thematic overview of literature streams according to the structure of the underlying supply chains. We identify various gaps in the current literature including areas in multi-echelon and multi-product supply chain research. Furthermore, we consider dual-purpose and dedicated levers for building resilience. Dual-purpose levers are resources that are able to promote efficiency in a supply chain while enhancing resilience in expectation. By contrast, dedicated resilience levers are resources that are able to guarantee the resilience of a supply chain in the face of particular disruptions without benefiting the supply chain in the absence of disruptions. We call for more research to better understand the value of dual-purpose and dedicated resilience levers to overall supply chain performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lücker et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10c5ca5e6663f9d26465ddhttps://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241302735
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Supply Chain Disruptions: Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake*2020 · 929 citations
  2. 2OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review2015 · 782 citations
  3. 3Achieving supply chain efficiency and resilience by using multi‐level commons2021 · 131 citations
  4. 4Managing Disruption Risk: The Interplay Between Operations and Insurance2012 · 208 citations
  5. 5Better to Bend than to Break: Sharing Supply Risk Using the Supply-Flexibility Contract2020 · 36 citations