PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1993Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research70 citations

Pragmatics and SLI

View Full Paper
HCHolly K. CraigJEJulia L. Evans

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Selected discourse behaviors of children with specific language impairment (SLI) presenting expressive (E:SLI) or combined expressive-receptive deficits (E-R:SLI) were compared to each other and to chronological age-mates and younger mean length of utterance (MLU)-matched children with normal-language skills. The two SLI subgroups varied from each other on specific measures of turn-taking and cohesion. These findings imply the need for future normative work with SLI subgroups differing in receptive skill, and indicate that, in the interim, pragmatic research with this population will need to consider potential effects of receptive language status when interpreting variations in outcomes for discourse-based variables.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Craig et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10c8f88102eb4b66ee64e8https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3604.777
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper