PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 23, 2013Public Administration218 citationsOpen Access

Explaining Radical Policy Change: The Case of Climate Change and Energy Policy Under the British Labour Government 2006–10

View Full Paper
NCNeil CarterMJMichael Jacobs

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

An innovative framework combining the ‘multiple streams’ ( MS ) and ‘punctuated equilibrium’ ( PE ) models of agenda‐setting is used to explain the transformation of UK climate change and energy policy under the Labour Government between 2006 and 2010. The coupling of the problem, politics and policy streams by policy entrepreneurs ( MS ), and changes in policy image and institutional venues ( PE ), were critical in opening a policy window, disrupting the existing policy monopoly and enabling radical policy initiatives. The case study suggests two revisions to the models: (1) policy windows can remain open far longer than either model typically predicts; and (2) party politics, especially where party competition generates a ‘competitive consensus’, can be important for both initiating and prolonging policy change in parliamentary systems. An important factor typically overlooked by both models is the significant policy entrepreneurship role that government ministers can play, particularly when an issue becomes part of their ‘narrative identity’.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carter et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10d90639dd87f6d0ee6e69https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12046
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper