PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 202113 citationsOpen Access

Using Uncertainty in Deep Learning Reconstruction for Cone-Beam CT of the Brain

PWPengwei WuASAlejandro SisniegaAUAli Uneri

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Contrast resolution beyond the limits of conventional cone-beam CT (CBCT) systems is essential to high-quality imaging of the brain. We present a deep learning reconstruction method (dubbed DL-Recon) that integrates physically principled reconstruction models with DL-based image synthesis based on the statistical uncertainty in the synthesis image. A synthesis network was developed to generate a synthesized CBCT image (DL-Synthesis) from an uncorrected filtered back-projection (FBP) image. To improve generalizability (including accurate representation of lesions not seen in training), voxel-wise epistemic uncertainty of DL-Synthesis was computed using a Bayesian inference technique (Monte-Carlo dropout). In regions of high uncertainty, the DL-Recon method incorporates information from a physics-based reconstruction model and artifact-corrected projection data. Two forms of the DL-Recon method are proposed: (i) image-domain fusion of DL-Synthesis and FBP (DL-FBP) weighted by DL uncertainty; and (ii) a model-based iterative image reconstruction (MBIR) optimization using DL-Synthesis to compute a spatially varying regularization term based on DL uncertainty (DL-MBIR). The error in DL-Synthesis images was correlated with the uncertainty in the synthesis estimate. Compared to FBP and PWLS, the DL-Recon methods (both DL-FBP and DL-MBIR) showed ~50% reduction in noise (at matched spatial resolution) and ~40-70% improvement in image uniformity. Conventional DL-Synthesis alone exhibited ~10-60% under-estimation of lesion contrast and ~5-40% reduction in lesion segmentation accuracy (Dice coefficient) in simulated and real brain lesions, suggesting a lack of reliability / generalizability for structures unseen in the training data. DL-FBP and DL-MBIR improved the accuracy of reconstruction by directly incorporating information from the measurements in regions of high uncertainty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10da3149545a83bbee7ecfhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2108.09229
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cone‐beam CT for imaging of the head/brain: Development and assessment of scanner prototype and reconstruction algorithms2020 · 32 citations
  2. 2Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in\n Deep Learning2015 · 4,187 citations
  3. 3Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography1994 · 614 citations
  4. 4Low-Dose CT With a Residual Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Neural Network2017 · 1,892 citations
  5. 5Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat‐panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology1997 · 262 citations