PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2020Political Research Exchange5 citationsOpen Access

Mixed competences and ‘second generation’ trade agreements: a consideration of EU disintegration

View Full Paper
VDValerie J. D’Erman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This paper considers recent developments in EU trade policy in the context of the theoretical framework of ‘disintegration’. The events surrounding the conclusion of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada, as well as the CJEU’s opinion on the EU-Singapore free trade agreement, underscore the limits to centralized decision-making in trade policy for newer ‘second generation’ trade agreements. The argument is that recent political developments with EU trade agreements have complicated the possibility for further exclusive competence at the supranational level, and in doing so have indirectly illustrated some potential limits to further economic integration. This examination is helpful when considering if (or to what degree) the logic of European integration has been weakened in the aftermath of various crises, and whether the federal structure of EU governance is able to accommodate changes in the allocation of competences in trade policy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Valerie J. D’Erman (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10e6accfa01e990d9fc47ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2020.1806003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper