PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 27, 2008The American Journal of Cardiology184 citationsOpen Access

Additive Prognostic Value of Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients With Chest Pain Syndrome and Normal or Near-Normal Coronary Arteries

View Full Paper
RSRosa SicariFRFausto RigoLCLauro Cortigiani

Structured PICO

Does abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR <2) predict hard clinical events in patients with chest pain and normal or near-normal coronary arteries?

P
Population
394 patients with chest pain, angiographically nonsignificant (<50%) stenosis in any major vessel, normal left ventricular function, and test negativity for conventional wall motion criteria during stress, mean age 61, 171 men.
I
Intervention
Abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR <2) evaluated by Doppler during dipyridamole stress echocardiography (0.84 mg/kg over 6 minutes)
C
Comparator
Normal coronary flow reserve
O
Outcome
Hard events (death and nonfatal myocardial infarction)hard clinical

Abstract

In patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries and chest pain, pharmacologic stress echocardiography can identify a subgroup of patients with a less benign prognosis. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) can currently be combined with wall motion analysis during vasodilator stress echocardiography. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of CFR response in patients with normal coronary arteries and normal wall motion during stress. We selected 394 patients (171 men, 61 ± 11 years of age) who underwent dipyridamole stress echocardiography (0.84 mg/kg over 6 minutes) with 2-dimensional echocardiography and CFR evaluation of the LAD by Doppler. All had angiographically nonsignificant (<50% quantitatively assessed) stenosis in any major vessel, normal left ventricular function (wall motion score index 1), and test negativity for conventional wall motion criteria. Images were independently read by a core laboratory for wall motion and a core laboratory for CFR. Mean CFR was 2.5 ± 0.6 and 87 patients (22%) had an abnormal CFR <2. During a median follow-up of 51 months, 31 events occurred, namely 4 deaths and 27 nonfatal myocardial infarctions (3 ST-elevated myocardial infarctions and 24 non–ST-elevated myocardial infarctions). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for hard events showed a better outcome for those patients with a normal CFR compared with those with an abnormal CFR (96% vs 55%, p = 0.001, at 48 months of follow-up). In conclusion, in patients with angiographically normal or near-normal coronary arteries and preserved at-rest regional and global left ventricular function at baseline and during stress, CFR adds incremental value to the prognostic stratification achieved with clinical and angiographic data. In patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries and chest pain, pharmacologic stress echocardiography can identify a subgroup of patients with a less benign prognosis. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) can currently be combined with wall motion analysis during vasodilator stress echocardiography. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of CFR response in patients with normal coronary arteries and normal wall motion during stress. We selected 394 patients (171 men, 61 ± 11 years of age) who underwent dipyridamole stress echocardiography (0.84 mg/kg over 6 minutes) with 2-dimensional echocardiography and CFR evaluation of the LAD by Doppler. All had angiographically nonsignificant (<50% quantitatively assessed) stenosis in any major vessel, normal left ventricular function (wall motion score index 1), and test negativity for conventional wall motion criteria. Images were independently read by a core laboratory for wall motion and a core laboratory for CFR. Mean CFR was 2.5 ± 0.6 and 87 patients (22%) had an abnormal CFR <2. During a median follow-up of 51 months, 31 events occurred, namely 4 deaths and 27 nonfatal myocardial infarctions (3 ST-elevated myocardial infarctions and 24 non–ST-elevated myocardial infarctions). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for hard events showed a better outcome for those patients with a normal CFR compared with those with an abnormal CFR (96% vs 55%, p = 0.001, at 48 months of follow-up). In conclusion, in patients with angiographically normal or near-normal coronary arteries and preserved at-rest regional and global left ventricular function at baseline and during stress, CFR adds incremental value to the prognostic stratification achieved with clinical and angiographic data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sicari et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10ee5eb21a4e8c150b09bdhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.033
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper