PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2002Parliamentary Affairs179 citations

Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand's Women MPs

View Full Paper
SGShane T. Grey

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

It is often claimed that women will only influence upon political decisions once they achieve a critical mass within legislative bodies. Assertions about critical mass are made by academics and politicians alike, even though the concept is under-developed and relatively untested. This article outlines the expectations in existing critical mass literature and tests these using the New Zealand House of Representatives as a case study. New Zealand was chosen because women have occupied just under 30% of the seats in the parliament from 1996 and have thus almost reached the level of representation most commonly regarded as constituting a critical mass (30-35%). What the New Zealand case highlighted was the number of complexities that are ignored in existing critical mass literature and the likelihood that different critical masses are necessary depending on the outcome sought.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shane T. Grey (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10eec563b25c787d9fbd86https://doi.org/10.1093/parlij/55.1.19
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper