PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2003The Journal of Physiology249 citations

Cellular electrophysiology of canine pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes: action potential and ionic current properties

View Full Paper
JEJoachim R. EhrlichTCTae‐Joon ChaLZLiming Zhang

Key Result

Canine pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes exhibited a less negative resting membrane potential (-66 vs -74 mV, P<0.0001) and distinct ionic current properties compared to left atrial cells.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Canine pulmonary vein (PV) and left atrium (LA) free wall cardiomyocytes
I
Intervention
Standard microelectrode recording and whole-cell patch-clamp
C
Comparator
Left atrium (LA) free wall cardiomyocytes
O
Outcome
Action potentials and ionic currents (Resting membrane potential, action potential amplitude, Vmax, APD, ionic current densities)surrogate

Canine pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes possess a distinct distribution of transmembrane ion currents and action potential properties compared to left atrial cells, providing insights into their arrhythmogenic potential in atrial fibrillation.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: -66% vs -74%

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

Pulmonary vein (PV) cardiomyocytes play an important role in atrial fibrillation; however, little is known about their specific cellular electrophysiological properties. We applied standard microelectrode recording and whole-cell patch-clamp to evaluate action potentials and ionic currents in canine PVs and left atrium (LA) free wall. Resting membrane potential (RMP) averaged -66 +/- 1 mV in PVs and -74 +/- 1 mV in LA (P < 0.0001) and action potential amplitude averaged 76 +/- 2 mV in PVs vs. 95 +/- 2 mV in LA (P < 0.0001). PVs had smaller maximum phase 0 upstroke velocity (Vmax: 98 +/- 9 vs. 259 +/- 16 V s(-1), P < 0.0001) and action potential duration (APD): e.g. at 2 Hz, APD to 90% repolarization in PVs was 84 % of LA (P < 0.05). Na+ current density under voltage-clamp conditions was similar in PV and LA, suggesting that smaller Vmax in PVs was due to reduced RMP. Inward rectifier current density in the PV cardiomyocytes was approximately 58% that in the LA, potentially accounting for the less negative RMP in PVs. Slow and rapid delayed rectifier currents were greater in the PV (by approximately 60 and approximately 50 %, respectively), whereas transient outward K+ current and L-type Ca2+ current were significantly smaller (by approximately 25 and approximately 30%, respectively). Na(+)-Ca(2+)-exchange (NCX) current and T-type Ca2+ current were not significantly different. In conclusion, PV cardiomyocytes have a discrete distribution of transmembrane ion currents associated with specific action potential properties, with potential implications for understanding PV electrical activity in cardiac arrhythmias.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ehrlich et al. (2003) studied Atrial fibrillation. Pulmonary vein (PV) cardiomyocytes vs. Left atrium (LA) free wall cardiomyocytes was evaluated on Resting membrane potential (RMP) (p=<0.0001). Canine pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes exhibited a less negative resting membrane potential (-66 vs -74 mV, P<0.0001) and distinct ionic current properties compared to left atrial cells.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10f74449545a83bbeebcc8https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2003.00801.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper