PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1996Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume179 citations

Thromboprophylaxis and Death After Total Hip Replacement

View Full Paper
DMDavid W. MurrayABAnnie BrittonCBChristopher Bulstrode

Key Result

Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis did not significantly decrease the overall death rate (0.3% to 0.4%) or fatal pulmonary embolism rate after total hip replacement.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=130,000)

Structured PICO

Does pharmacological thromboprophylaxis reduce death or fatal pulmonary embolism in patients having a total hip replacement?

P
Population
130,000 patients having a total hip replacement
I
Intervention
Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (including heparin)
C
Comparator
No prophylaxis
O
Outcome
Death or fatal pulmonary embolismhard clinical

Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis does not significantly decrease the overall death rate or fatal pulmonary embolism rate after total hip replacement, challenging guidelines that recommend its routine use for this purpose.

Limitations

  • The included studies were highly varied in content and quality.
  • Studies were varied in content and quality

Abstract

The recommendation that patients having a total hip replacement should receive pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is based on the belief that fatal pulmonary embolism is common, and that prophylaxis will decrease the death rate. To investigate these assumptions we performed a meta-analysis of all studies on hip replacement which included information about death or fatal pulmonary embolism. A total of 130 000 patients was included. The studies were so varied in content and quality that the results of our analysis must be interpreted with some caution. The fatal pulmonary embolism rate was 0.1% to 0.2% even in patients who received no prophylaxis. This is an order of magnitude lower than that which is generally quoted, and therefore the potential benefit of prophylaxis is small and may not justify the risks. To balance the risks and benefits we must consider the overall death rate. This was 0.3% to 0.4%, and neither heparin nor any other prophylactic agent caused a significant decrease. Our study demonstrates that there is not enough evidence in the literature to conclude that any form of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis decreases the death rate after total hip replacement. For this reason guidelines which recommend their routine use to prevent death after hip replacement are not justified.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Murray et al. (1996) conducted a meta-analysis in Total hip replacement (n=130,000). Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis vs. No prophylaxis was evaluated on Overall death rate and fatal pulmonary embolism. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis did not significantly decrease the overall death rate (0.3% to 0.4%) or fatal pulmonary embolism rate after total hip replacement.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10fb8949545a83bbeec7f4https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.78b6.0780863
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper