PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 9, 2010African Journal on Conflict Resolution35 citationsOpen Access

Implications of the Bakassi conflict resolution for Cameroon

FBFrancis Menjo Baye

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This paper sketches a conceptual framework of international conflict dynamics and resolution, examines the geopolitics of the Bakassi dispute between Nigeria and Cameroon, and outlines socio-economic implications of its peaceful settlement. Neglect and subsequent discovery of oil deposits subjected the Bakassi Peninsula to claims and counter-claims for sovereignty, military occupation and recourse to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The ICJ’s ruling in 2002 in favour of Cameroon, although based on sound historical evidence, faced implementation difficulties. However, following mediation by the United Nations (UN) Secretary-General, good faith by protagonists, the Green-tree Agreement and subsequent instruments, Nigeria completed the withdrawal of its military, police and administration from the Bakassi Peninsula by 14 August 2008. Putting aside disruptive activities by social movements, the entire process could be viewed as a model in peaceful resolution of border conflicts. Implications of the settlement anchor on expenditure-reducing and expenditure-switching effects, wealth-generating effects, and enhanced cross-border activities. Infrastructural developments and effective presence are considered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Francis Menjo Baye (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10fe2facd1dbe06464c782https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcr.v10i1.59305
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper