PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2006Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine57 citationsOpen Access

From optimism to disillusion about commitment to transparency in the medico-industrial complex

View Full Paper
ICIain Chalmers

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In the mid-1970s, I was involved with others in trying to assemble evidence about the effects of care during pregnancy and childbirth. We started by searching Medline to identify reports of controlled trials that we thought might be sufficiently reliable to be taken into account in our analyses; and then searched about 70 journals by hand, page by page, back to the issues published in 1950. We found about 3500 reports of controlled trials and, with help from the World Health Organization, we published the references to these in a classified bibliography in the mid-1980s.1 But then we thought, ‘What about trials that don’t get published? If we don’t take those into account, we might reach biased conclusions’. We knew of anecdotes about researchers who had had disappointing results of trials, and

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iain Chalmers (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a110b1e0785bfc795f32969https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.99.7.337
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper