PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 26, 1996New England Journal of Medicine776 citations

Measuring Quality of Care

View Full Paper
RBRobert H. BrookEMElizabeth A. McGlynnPCPaul D. Cleary

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how measuring quality of care can enhance medical practice and outcomes.
  • Utilized advanced metrics to monitor care quality across multiple hospitals.
  • Involved assessments of patient outcomes, such as infections and deaths, in clinical settings.
  • Facilitated reviews by medical societies for physician performance evaluation.
  • Identified variations in practice patterns indicating inconsistent quality of care.
  • Demonstrated that improved measurement techniques correlate with better patient outcomes.
  • Highlighted clinicians' growing interest in adopting systematic quality improvement strategies.

Abstract

Until recently, we relied primarily on professional judgment to ensure that patients received high-quality medical care. Hospitals routinely monitored poor outcomes, such as deaths or infections, to identify ways to improve the quality of care. In rare cases, medical societies reviewed the performance of physicians. However, monitoring of and improvement in quality were generally left to individual clinicians.This situation has changed dramatically. We have learned that practice patterns and the quality of medical care vary much more than many people had realized, our ability to measure the quality of care has advanced considerably, and clinicians are increasingly interested in . . .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brook et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a110c7d6da19daf8316992ehttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199609263351311
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper