PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 2018Journal of Asian and African Studies12 citations

A Challenge to Conventional Wisdom: Locating Agency in Angola’s and Ghana’s Economic Engagements with China

View Full Paper
RCRonald ChipaikePBPaul Henri Bischoff

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article makes the point that African states with significant strategic resources and democratic governance systems bargain better in economic and development assistance engagements with China and other partners. In democratic African states, non-state actors play critical complementary roles to the state, leading to multi-faceted forms of African agency. For non-democratic states, a significant limiting factor in their agency is the lack of working relationships between the state and non-state actors. Concomitantly, such states find themselves with weak bargaining and negotiating capacities. If African agency is to be assertive, then state and non-state actors should work together when engaging external partners.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chipaike et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1113cccd70b138bf1a2807https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909618763922
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1African East-Asian Affairs2015 · 35 citations
  2. 2‘Unconditional aid’: Assessing the impact of China's development assistance to Zimbabwe2012 · 47 citations
  3. 3A Question of Agency: Africa in international politics2012 · 152 citations
  4. 4A Neo-Colonialist Predator or Development Partner? China's engagement and rebalance in Africa2014 · 125 citations
  5. 5The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century2003 · 569 citations