PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2011American Economic Review1,094 citationsOpen Access

Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya

EDEsther DufloPDPascaline DupasMKMichael Kremer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

To the extent that students benefit from high-achieving peers, tracking will help strong students and hurt weak ones. However, all students may benefit if tracking allows teachers to better tailor their instruction level. Lower-achieving pupils are particularly likely to benefit from tracking when teachers have incentives to teach to the top of the distribution. We propose a simple model nesting these effects and test its implications in a randomized tracking experiment conducted with 121 primary schools in Kenya. While the direct effect of high-achieving peers is positive, tracking benefited lower-achieving pupils indirectly by allowing teachers to teach to their level. (JEL I21, J45, O15)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duflo et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11c24b279ddf38dc617ee3https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.1739
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Key difficulties in identifying the effects of ability grouping on student achievement2000 · 76 citations
  2. 2Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment2003 · 972 citations
  3. 3School Tracking and Development of Cognitive Skills2009 · 5 citations
  4. 4Inside the Black of Box of Ability Peer Effects: Evidence from Variation in Low Achievers in the Classroom2008 · 14 citations
  5. 5Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation2000 · 1,249 citations