PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 12, 2004Journal of Neuroscience516 citationsOpen Access

Functional Imaging of Working Memory after 24 Hr of Total Sleep Deprivation

MCMichael W.L. CheeWCWei Chieh Choo

Key Result

Twenty-four hours of total sleep deprivation significantly slowed response times in working memory tasks and altered cortical activation, with better preserved performance in the more complex task.

Structured PICO

Does 24 hours of total sleep deprivation alter working memory performance and functional brain activation in healthy young adults?

P
Population
14 right-handed, healthy undergraduate volunteers (5 women; mean age 23 years; range 19-24) with habitual good sleep (average 7.2 +/- 0.9 hr/night) and no history of psychiatric illness or sleep disorders.
I
Intervention
24 hours of total sleep deprivation (SD)
C
Comparator
Rested wakefulness (RW) (crossover design)
O
Outcome
Working memory performance (response times, accuracy, omitted responses) and blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal changes on fMRI during maintenance (LTR) and manipulation (PLUS) taskssurrogate

Total sleep deprivation impairs working memory and alters functional brain activation, though compensatory prefrontal and thalamic activation may help preserve performance in more complex tasks.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 883% vs 825%

p-value: p=<0.005

Limitations

  • Short-term total sleep deprivation is artificial compared to chronic sleep deprivation, which is more common and has greater general relevance.
  • Accuracy results were range limited, restricting behavioral correlation analyses to response times.
  • Inter-individual differences in the spatial location of activation could dilute observed effects in multi-subject voxel-by-voxel analysis.

Abstract

The neurobehavioral effects of 24 hr of total sleep deprivation (SD) on working memory in young healthy adults was studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Two tasks, one testing maintenance and the other manipulation and maintenance, were used. After SD, response times for both tasks were significantly slower. Performance was better preserved in the more complex task. Both tasks activated a bilateral, left hemisphere-dominant frontal-parietal network of brain regions reflecting the engagement of verbal working memory. In both states, manipulation elicited more extensive and bilateral (L>R) frontal, parietal, and thalamic activation. After SD, there was reduced blood oxygenation level-dependent signal response in the medial parietal region with both tasks. Reduced deactivation of the anterior medial frontal and posterior cingulate regions was observed with both tasks. Finally, there was disproportionately greater activation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and bilateral thalamus when manipulation was required. This pattern of changes in activation and deactivation bears similarity to that observed when healthy elderly adults perform similar tasks. Our data suggest that reduced activation and reduced deactivation could underlie cognitive impairment after SD and that increased prefrontal and thalamic activation may represent compensatory adaptations. The additional left frontal activation elicited after SD is postulated to be task dependent and contingent on task complexity. Our findings provide neural correlates to explain why task performance in relatively more complex tasks is better preserved relative to simpler ones after SD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chee et al. (2004) studied Healthy volunteers (Sleep Deprivation) (n=14). Total sleep deprivation vs. Rested wakefulness was evaluated on Response time for maintenance working memory task (LTR) in milliseconds (p=<0.005). Twenty-four hours of total sleep deprivation significantly slowed response times in working memory tasks and altered cortical activation, with better preserved performance in the more complex task.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11cadca54a38d693fd3b2fhttps://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0007-04.2004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper