PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 27, 2018BMJ evidence-based medicine150 citationsOpen Access

Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews

APAnnette PlüddemannJAJeffrey K AronsonIOIgho Onakpoya

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Having suggested that so-called ‘rapid’ reviews have been misnamed and should instead be called ‘restricted reviews’, Members of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine now suggest ways in which such reviews should be restricted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Plüddemann et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11d0f78ac3726642dceaaahttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110990
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure2018 · 90 citations
  2. 2RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?2008 · 166 citations
  3. 3Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews: an international survey2017 · 64 citations
  4. 4Comparison of a full systematic review versus rapid review approaches to assess a newborn screening test for tyrosinemia type 12017 · 59 citations
  5. 5The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies2016 · 38 citations