PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 25, 2008Journal of the American Geriatrics Society188 citationsOpen Access

Racial and Ethnic Differences in End‐of‐Life Care in Fee‐for‐Service Medicare Beneficiaries with Advanced Cancer

View Full Paper
ASAlexander K. SmithCECraig C. EarleEMEllen P. McCarthy

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine racial and ethnic variation in use of hospice and high-intensity care in patients with terminal illness. DESIGN: Retrospective, secondary data analysis. SETTING: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Database from 1992 to 1999 with follow-up data until December 31, 2001. PARTICIPANTS: Forty thousand nine hundred sixty non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Asian, and Hispanic fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older with advanced-stage lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer. MEASURMENTS: Hospice use and indicators of high-intensity care at the end of life. RESULTS: Whereas 42.0% of elderly white patients with advanced cancer enrolled in hospice, enrollment was lower for black (36.9%), Asian (32.2%), and Hispanic (37.7%) patients. Differences between white and Hispanic patients disappeared after adjustment for clinical and sociodemographic factors. Higher proportions of black and Asian patients than of white patients were hospitalized two or more times (11.7%, 15.0%, 13.7%, respectively), spent more than 14 days hospitalized (11.4%, 17.4%, 15.6%, respectively), and were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (12.0%, 17.0%, 16.2%, respectively) in the last month of life and died in the hospital (26.5%, 31.3%, 33.7%, respectively). Unadjusted differences in receipt of high-intensity care according to race or ethnicity remained after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Black and Asian patients with advanced cancer were more likely than whites to be hospitalized frequently and for prolonged periods, be admitted to the ICU, die in the hospital, and be enrolled in hospice at lower rates. Further research is needed to examine the degree to which patient preferences or other factors explain these differences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11dcb73f4fe1a84cb4d246https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02081.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparing the Quality of Death for Hospice and Non-Hospice Cancer Patients1988 · 215 citations
  2. 2Racial Differences in Attitudes Toward Hospice Care1990 · 43 citations
  3. 3Paradox lost: Explaining the hispanic adult mortality advantage2004 · 909 citations
  4. 4Family Perspectives on End-of-Life Care at the Last Place of Care2004 · 1,495 citations
  5. 5Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden2002 · 886 citations