PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2011Circulation132 citationsOpen Access

Randomized Trial of Atopaxar in the Treatment of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

View Full Paper
SWStephen D. WiviottMFMarcus FlatherMOMichelle L. O’Donoghue

Key Result

Atopaxar treatment in patients with coronary artery disease increased overall bleeding by CURE criteria compared to placebo (3.9% vs 0.6%; RR 6.82, P=0.03), with no difference in major bleeding.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=720)

Blinding

Double-blind

Randomization

randomized

Structured PICO

Does atopaxar increase bleeding or reduce ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease?

P
Population
720 subjects with a qualifying history of coronary artery disease (CAD)
I
Intervention
Atopaxar 50, 100, or 200 mg daily for 24 weeks
C
Comparator
Matching placebo for 24 weeks
O
Outcome
Bleeding according to the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) classificationssafety

In patients with CAD, the PAR-1 antagonist atopaxar achieved high platelet inhibition but increased minor bleeding and caused transient transaminitis and QTc prolongation, without a statistically significant reduction in ischemic events.

Main Result

Effect estimate: RR 6.82

Absolute Event Rate: 3.9% vs 0.6%

p-value: p=0.03

Limitations

  • Small sample size requiring larger-scale trials to determine clinically meaningful effects

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thrombin is a key mediator of platelet activation. Atopaxar is a reversible protease-activated receptor-1 antagonist that interferes with thrombin-mediated platelet effects. The phase II Lessons From Antagonizing the Cellular Effect of Thrombin-Coronary Artery Disease (LANCELOT-CAD) trial examined the safety and tolerability of prolonged therapy with atopaxar in subjects with CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects with a qualifying history were randomized in a double-blind fashion to 3 dosing regimens of atopaxar (50, 100, or 200 mg daily) or matching placebo for 24 weeks and followed up for an additional 4 weeks. The key safety end points were bleeding according to the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) classifications. Secondary objectives included platelet aggregation and major adverse cardiac events. Seven hundred and twenty subjects were randomized. Overall bleeding rates tended to be higher with atopaxar compared with placebo by CURE criteria (placebo, 0.6%; atopaxar, 3.9%; relative risk, 6.82, P=0.03; 50 mg, 3.9%; 100 mg, 1.7%; 200 mg, 5.9%; P for trend=0.01) and TIMI criteria (placebo, 6.8%; atopaxar, 10.3%; relative risk, 1.52, P=0.17; 50 mg, 9.9%; 100 mg, 8.1%; 200 mg, 12.9%; P for trend=0.07). There was no difference in major bleeding. Major adverse cardiac events were numerically lower in the atopaxar subjects. All atopaxar regimens achieved high levels of platelet inhibition. A transient elevation in liver transaminases and dose-dependent QTc prolongation without apparent complications were observed in higher-dose atopaxar treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this dose-ranging study of patients with CAD, treatment with atopaxar resulted in platelet inhibition, more minor bleeding, and numerically but not statistically fewer ischemic events. Larger-scale trials are needed to determine whether these patterns translate into clinically meaningful effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00312052.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wiviott et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in Coronary Artery Disease (n=720). Atopaxar vs. Placebo was evaluated on Bleeding according to CURE criteria (RR 6.82, p=0.03). Atopaxar treatment in patients with coronary artery disease increased overall bleeding by CURE criteria compared to placebo (3.9% vs 0.6%; RR 6.82, P=0.03), with no difference in major bleeding.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11e78745487b7639a58eb2https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.001404
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper