PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 9, 2016The Review of Economic Studies100 citations

The Industrialization and Economic Development of Russia through the Lens of a Neoclassical Growth Model

View Full Paper
ACAnton CheremukhinMGMikhail GolosovSGSergei Guriev

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article studies the structural transformation of Russia in 1885–1940 from an agrarian to an industrial economy through the lens of a two-sector neoclassical growth model. We construct a data set that covers Tsarist Russia during 1885–1913 and Soviet Union during 1928–1940. We develop a methodology that allows us to identify the types of frictions and economic mechanisms that had the largest quantitative impact on Russian economic development. We find that entry barriers and monopoly power in the non-agricultural sector were the most important reason for Tsarist Russia’s failure to industrialize before World War I. Soviet industrial transformation after 1928 was achieved primarily by reducing such frictions, albeit coinciding with a significantly lower performance of productivity in both agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. We find no evidence that Tsarist agricultural institutions were a significant barrier to labour reallocation to manufacturing, or that “Big Push” mechanisms were a major driver of Soviet growth.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheremukhin et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1224abc031bb6829a5fc49https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdw026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper