PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 12, 2004American Journal of Agricultural Economics92 citations

Hog Producer Preferences for Marketing Contract Attributes

View Full Paper
BRBrian E. RoeTSThomas L. SporlederBBBetsy Belleville

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We use a stated preference instrument to elicit producer preferences for the attributes of risk-shifting hog marketing contracts and express acceptable producer trade-offs between contract attributes in a convenient dollar metric. Respondents value an increase in a window contract's price ceiling three to five times more than the same increase in the price floor, which suggests that hog producers dislike contracts that limit up-side price potential (limit positive skewness). The contractor's organizational form is also important. Cooperative forms are preferred by many respondents, particularly those who state that trust in the contractor is an important antecedent for any contractual relationship. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roe et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a122c81a4bed3c7b166b580https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00566.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1HOG RISK MANAGEMENT SURVEY: SUMMARY AND PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS2000 · 13 citations
  2. 2A TRANSACTION COST ECONOMICS AND PROPERTY RIGHTS THEORY APPROACH TO FARMLAND LEASE PREFERENCES2001 · 7 citations
  3. 3An Experimental Analysis of Intertemporal Allocation Behavior2000 · 22 citations
  4. 4PRODUCTION AND MARKETING CHARACTERISTICS OF U.S. PORK PRODUCERS, 1997-19981998 · 26 citations
  5. 5Predicting participation intentions for optional energy services1998 · 6 citations