PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2010Topics in Cognitive Science326 citationsOpen Access

Computational Analyses of Multilevel Discourse Comprehension

View Full Paper
AGArthur C. GraesserDMDanielle S. McNamara

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The proposed multilevel framework of discourse comprehension includes the surface code, the textbase, the situation model, the genre and rhetorical structure, and the pragmatic communication level. We describe these five levels when comprehension succeeds and also when there are communication misalignments and comprehension breakdowns. A computer tool has been developed, called Coh-Metrix, that scales discourse (oral or print) on dozens of measures associated with the first four discourse levels. The measurement of these levels with an automated tool helps researchers track and better understand multilevel discourse comprehension. Two sets of analyses illustrate the utility of Coh-Metrix in discourse theory and educational practice. First, Coh-Metrix was used to measure the cohesion of the text base and situation model, as well as potential extraneous variables, in a sample of published studies that manipulated text cohesion. This analysis helped us better understand what was precisely manipulated in these studies and the implications for discourse comprehension mechanisms. Second, Coh-Metrix analyses are reported for samples of narrative and science texts in order to advance the argument that traditional text difficulty measures are limited because they fail to accommodate most of the levels of the multilevel discourse comprehension framework.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Graesser et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a124917a4bed3c7b166dc1bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Way Things Work1988 · 70 citations
  2. 2Einstein's Dreams1992 · 55 citations
  3. 3Using language: Index of names1996 · 2,711 citations
  4. 4An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution1994 · 764 citations
  5. 5Human behavior and the principle of least effort1949 · 6,462 citations