PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2003Language358 citations

Seven dimensions of portability for language documentation and description

View Full Paper
SBSteven BirdGSGary Simons

Key Points

  • This article examines how digital technologies affect the portability of language documentation and the challenges faced in preserving it.
  • Review of existing software tools for language documentation.
  • Analysis of portability problems across seven dimensions: content, format, discovery, access, citation, preservation, and rights.
  • Recommendations for best practices in handling digital language resources.
  • Identified significant portability challenges for digital language resources compared to traditional formats.
  • Articulated values that influence current practices in language documentation.
  • Provided a comprehensive set of recommendations for improving the usability and longevity of digital resources.

Abstract

The process of documenting and describing the world's languages is undergoing radical transformation with the rapid uptake of new digital technologies for capture, storage, annotation, and dissemination. While these technologies greatly enhance our ability to create digital data, their uncritical adoption has compromised our ability to preserve this data. Consequently, new digital language resources of all kinds—lexicons, interlinear texts, grammars, language maps, field notes, recordings—are proving difficult to reuse and less portable than the conventional printed resources they replace. This article is concerned with the portability of digital language resources, specifically with their ability to transcend computer environments, scholarly communities, domains of application, and the passage of time. We review existing software tools and digital technologies for language documentation and description, and analyze portability problems in the seven areas of content, format, discovery, access, citation, preservation, and rights. We articulate the values that underlie our intuitions about good and bad practices, and lay out an extensive set of recommendations to serve as a starting point for the community-wide discussion that we envisage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bird et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a125a1cea48cb855a34a665https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0149
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing1987 · 205 citations
  2. 2The sounds of the world’s languages. By Peter Ladefoged and Ian Maddieson. Oxford Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996. Pp. xxi, 426. Paper $31.95.1998 · 1,740 citations
  3. 3African Music: A People's Art1976 · 184 citations
  4. 4Linguistic research under aboriginal control: A personal account of fieldwork in central Australia11992 · 74 citations
  5. 5Building a Knowledge Base of Morphosyntactic Terminology2001 · 14 citations