PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2022Journal of the American College of Cardiology64 citationsOpen Access

Clinical Risk Score to Predict Pathogenic Genotypes in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

LELuis Escobar-LópezJOJuan Pablo OchoaARAna Royuela

Key Result

The Madrid Genotype Score accurately predicted a positive genetic test in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, achieving an external validation C-statistic of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=2,112)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the Madrid Genotype Score predict a positive genetic test result in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy or isolated left ventricular systolic dysfunction?

P
Population
2,112 genotyped patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or isolated left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) (n=1,015 in derivation cohort from Spain, n=1,097 in external validation cohort from Maastricht and Trieste registries).
I
Intervention
Madrid Genotype Score (clinical risk score based on family history of DCM, low ECG voltage in peripheral leads, skeletal myopathy, absence of hypertension, and absence of LBBB)
O
Outcome
Positive genetic test result (G+)surrogate

The Madrid Genotype Score, using five simple clinical and electrocardiographic variables, accurately predicts the probability of a positive genetic test in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, which may help prioritize genetic testing.

Main Result

Effect estimate: C-statistic 0.74 (95% CI 0.71-0.78)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although genotyping allows family screening and influences risk-stratification in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or isolated left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), its result is negative in a significant number of patients, limiting its widespread adoption. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to develop and externally validate a score that predicts the probability for a positive genetic test result (G+) in DCM/LVSD. METHODS: Clinical, electrocardiogram, and echocardiographic variables were collected in 1,015 genotyped patients from Spain with DCM/LVSD. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables independently predicting G+, which were summed to create the Madrid Genotype Score. The external validation sample comprised 1,097 genotyped patients from the Maastricht and Trieste registries. RESULTS: A G+ result was found in 377 (37%) and 289 (26%) patients from the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Independent predictors of a G+ result in the derivation cohort were: family history of DCM (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.73-3.04; P < 0.001), low electrocardiogram voltage in peripheral leads (OR: 3.61; 95% CI: 2.38-5.49; P < 0.001), skeletal myopathy (OR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.60-7.31; P = 0.001), absence of hypertension (OR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.67-3.13; P < 0.001), and absence of left bundle branch block (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 2.57-5.01; P < 0.001). A score containing these factors predicted a G+ result, ranging from 3% when all predictors were absent to 79% when ≥4 predictors were present. Internal validation provided a C-statistic of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.77) and a calibration slope of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.80-1.10). The C-statistic in the external validation cohort was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The Madrid Genotype Score is an accurate tool to predict a G+ result in DCM/LVSD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Escobar-López et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or isolated left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) (n=2,112). Madrid Genotype Score was evaluated on Positive genetic test result (G+) (C-statistic 0.74, 95% CI 0.71-0.78). The Madrid Genotype Score accurately predicted a positive genetic test in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, achieving an external validation C-statistic of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a128aebf7bd4f5c7da6802chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.040
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper