PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 24, 2026Electronics0 citationsOpen Access

A Systematic Review of Industrial IoT Anomaly Detection and the Forensic Interpretability Gap

View Full Paper
MHMohamed Aziz Ben HahaABAfef BohliNHNaoufel Haddour

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the effectiveness of deep learning models for anomaly detection in Industrial IoT and identify the interpretability issues faced in operational environments.
  • Synthesis of 48 peer-reviewed studies from 2021 to 2025
  • Evaluation of F1-score degradation and explainability types
  • Development of a three-tier Edge-Cloud Forensic XAI architecture
  • Static models experience a 15–22% F1-score degradation in non-stationary settings across various industrial sectors
  • Current literature predominantly focuses on Type A explainability (80%) creating a forensic gap
  • Emerging research indicates a shift towards Type B methodologies without a unified framework for real-time detection and causal reasoning.

Abstract

The deployment of Deep Learning (DL) for anomaly detection in Industrial IoT (IIoT) is critically hampered by the non-stationary nature of industrial data streams and the lack of forensic-grade explainability. This systematic review synthesizes 48 peer-reviewed studies (2021–2025) to quantify the performance collapse of static models under concept drift and to establish operational criteria distinguishing post hoc feature attribution (Type A XAI) from forensic root-cause diagnosis (Type B XAI). Our analysis reveals three critical findings: (1) static DL models suffer a 15–22% F1-score degradation across wastewater, manufacturing, and energy sectors when deployed in non-stationary environments, rendering them operationally non-viable without continuous adaptation; (2) the current literature remains saturated with Type A explainability (80% of corpus through 2023), creating a Forensic Gap where operators receive statistical correlations but lack actionable maintenance directives; and (3) emerging 2024–2025 research marks a paradigm shift toward Type B methodologies, yet no unified framework bridges real-time detection with deep causal reasoning. To address these gaps, we contribute the following: (1) a validated operational taxonomy (Cohen’s κ=0.84) with reproducible five-criterion rubric enabling forensic XAI classification; (2) the first quantitative synthesis of drift penalties in industrial deployments; and (3) a three-tier Edge-Cloud Forensic XAI architecture that achieves 70% communication payload reduction via compressed latent vectors while integrating tnGAN-based data imputation (handling 20–30% missing data) and physics-guided causal reasoning engines. Our framework decouples millisecond-level edge detection from 1–3 s cloud-based forensic diagnosis, ensuring both operational responsiveness and actionable industrial insight. We conclude that the future of safety-critical IIoT demands “Forensic-by-Design” architectures leveraging machine unlearning for drift adaptation and LLM-based natural language interfaces for operator-facing explanations, positioning Industry 5.0 to bridge the gap between algorithmic detection and human-centered decision support.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haha et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12969048a0ea1665673729https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15112240
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper