PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Feasibility of self‑testing for acute malaria using rapid diagnostic in three peri‑urban sub‑Saharan African community settings

View Full Paper
HCHuman Sciences Research Council

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing malaria in peri-urban communities of sub-Saharan Africa.
  • Evaluated self-testing using rapid diagnostic tests in 100 households each in Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia.
  • Conducted surveys to assess perceived usability and acceptability among participants.
  • Measured test sensitivity and specificity against trained team interpretations.
  • In Kenya, 11.5% tested positive for malaria; South Africa had 0% and Zambia had 1.8%.
  • Participants demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity in interpreting tests compared to trained personnel.
  • Over 96% felt the RDT would be easy to use, with high confidence in self-interpretation across all sites.

Abstract

Malaria is a significant cause of under-five child mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The World Health Organization (WHO)-approved rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for malaria offer a resource-efficient alternative to gold standard diagnostic methods and may improve timely access to care through self-testing. The feasibility of use of RDT for self-testing was evaluated in 100 households each in Migori County, Kenya; KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa; and Copperbelt Province, Zambia. Surveys assessed perceived usability, acceptability, and preferences for RDTs among consenting participants. Among 225 participants in Kenya, 80 in South Africa, and 163 in Zambia, 25 (11.5%), 0 (0.0%), and 3 (1.8%) tested positive for malaria, respectively. In Kenya and Zambia, 89% of participants reported previous malaria diagnoses. Participants across all three sites interpreted the RDT with 100% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity compared to RDT interpretation performed by a trained study team member, with only one individual interpreting their test incorrectly. Over 96% of participants across all three sites felt the RDT would be easy to use for specimen collection, test operation, and result interpretation, and 160 (100%) Kenyan participants, 74 (96.1%) South African participants, and 157 (99.4%) Zambian participants felt confident that they had interpreted their own test correctly. Participants’ perceived comfort for future self-testing with an RDT was high in Kenya (92%) and Zambia (86%), and moderate in South Africa (66%). These findings indicate that RDT self-testing is highly acceptable and feasible in SSA settings with a high malaria burden.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Human Sciences Research Council (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1296b248a0ea1665673af2https://doi.org/10.14749/32359788
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper